This apparently is the week for multiple unnecessary sequels, with “The Hangover Part III” going up against “Fast & Furious 6” (twice as uncalled-for) for that all-important teen-age dollar.
So I’ll give the same “meh” response to “H3” as I did to “Iron Man 3”: better than the second one, not as good as the first.
I heartily endorse the original “Hangover” as one of the funniest comedies of all time, a film that consistently produces big laughs all the way through and holds up during repeat viewings. “H2” upped the ante by moving the setting from Las Vegas to Bangkok but, essentially, telling the same story a second time, with perhaps a third of the laughs.
Now we’ve got “Part III.” And yes, I recognize that the Roman numeral is meant as a joke – but I have to point out that it’s about as funny as many of the gags in this uneven and busy film.
Really, it’s almost as pointless to write a review of “The Hangover Part III” as of “Fast & Furious 6.”
Featured Posts
Sunday, 9 April 2017
Monday, 11 April 2016
A General Defends The Bradley
January 15, 1986|By
Gen. Donald R. Keith, who was the Army deputy chief of staff for
research, development and acquistion and later commander of the Army
Material Command.
Over
the last few years, I have become a calloused reader of the
well-orchestrated assault by some elements of the media on many of the
weapons systems that are a part of the badly needed, long overdue
modernization of our defense forces. Most of the articles are flawed at
best by selective use of facts wrapped in editorial opinion, or at worst
by downright misinformation.
I am not just a casual observer of the most recent program under attack. I was involved with the Bradley Fighting Vehicle from the early 1970s until I retired in June, 1984.
I am not just a casual observer of the most recent program under attack. I was involved with the Bradley Fighting Vehicle from the early 1970s until I retired in June, 1984.
The
infantry fighting vehicle never was intended to be an armored personnel
carrier like the M113. The requirement from the beginning was for a
true fighting vehicle, because in a cooperative effort with our German
allies we found that the combination of mechanized infantry in vehicles
designed to maneuver and fight with tanks had a synergism on the
battlefield that greatly enhanced the effectiveness of the force.
When the situation called for the infantry squad to dismount and occupy a piece of terrain, that option was also available. From the very beginning, the armament for our fighting vehicle was a 25 mm. gun. During the development of the Bradley, a number of studies conducted by both the Army and the office of the secretary of defense suggested that if we did not thicken our antitank guided missile defense in Europe, we risked losing to Warsaw Pact blitzkrieg tactics early in any conflict.
The Army and the secretary of defense agreed that the least costly solution--both in people and dollars--was to add a TOW missile launcher to each Bradley so that every infantry squad could participate in the defensive phase of any battle by engaging enemy tanks at over 3,000 meters.
The bottom line is that the Bradley was designed to fill an urgent need, and its fielding along with the M1 has revolutionized our ability to cope with an adversary who has fielded very similar vehicles in far greater numbers.
Now, bear with me while I run through a brief tutorial on how combat vehicles are designed and the tradeoffs that are inherent in the process. There is no such thing as a totally invulnerable armored vehicle. You can always come up with some sort of gun or missile warhead that will defeat any armor known to man--even though it might be difficult and the weapon unwieldly.
Tough tradeoff analyses drive the designs of the other combat vehicles for the modern battlefield. The designer begins with the main threat the vehicle must survive while performing a specific set of missions--remembering that survivability involves much more than having armor that is impenetrable to threat munitions.
Things like agility, being able to fire accurately on the move and having ammunition and fuel compartmented can be as important as toughness of armor.
In the case of the Bradley (and with every infantry fighting vehicle in the free world and the Warsaw Pact), the judgment has been to armor them to a level that protects the occupants from artillery, mortar and bomb fragments, small arms and the medium-caliber cannons found on other infantry fighting vehicles.
These threats change over time, of course, so product improvements will be called for. In fact, the Army has had R&D requests before the Congress for the last several years to deal with the needed upgrades. These requests did not ask for money to turn the Bradley into a main battle tank as some might suggest.
When the situation called for the infantry squad to dismount and occupy a piece of terrain, that option was also available. From the very beginning, the armament for our fighting vehicle was a 25 mm. gun. During the development of the Bradley, a number of studies conducted by both the Army and the office of the secretary of defense suggested that if we did not thicken our antitank guided missile defense in Europe, we risked losing to Warsaw Pact blitzkrieg tactics early in any conflict.
The Army and the secretary of defense agreed that the least costly solution--both in people and dollars--was to add a TOW missile launcher to each Bradley so that every infantry squad could participate in the defensive phase of any battle by engaging enemy tanks at over 3,000 meters.
The bottom line is that the Bradley was designed to fill an urgent need, and its fielding along with the M1 has revolutionized our ability to cope with an adversary who has fielded very similar vehicles in far greater numbers.
Now, bear with me while I run through a brief tutorial on how combat vehicles are designed and the tradeoffs that are inherent in the process. There is no such thing as a totally invulnerable armored vehicle. You can always come up with some sort of gun or missile warhead that will defeat any armor known to man--even though it might be difficult and the weapon unwieldly.
Tough tradeoff analyses drive the designs of the other combat vehicles for the modern battlefield. The designer begins with the main threat the vehicle must survive while performing a specific set of missions--remembering that survivability involves much more than having armor that is impenetrable to threat munitions.
Things like agility, being able to fire accurately on the move and having ammunition and fuel compartmented can be as important as toughness of armor.
In the case of the Bradley (and with every infantry fighting vehicle in the free world and the Warsaw Pact), the judgment has been to armor them to a level that protects the occupants from artillery, mortar and bomb fragments, small arms and the medium-caliber cannons found on other infantry fighting vehicles.
These threats change over time, of course, so product improvements will be called for. In fact, the Army has had R&D requests before the Congress for the last several years to deal with the needed upgrades. These requests did not ask for money to turn the Bradley into a main battle tank as some might suggest.
In
fact, all the smoke about ``unrealistic testing`` involves what happens
when a tank main gun round or an antitank guided missile hits it. The
Army has made no bones about the fact that, if hit by those weapons, it
will be penetrated. The only testing that the Army was reluctant to
overdo was to demonstrate what we already knew.
Rather, the tests were designed to verify that the Army was getting what it was paying for from the contractor, to check new armors that would help keep pace with threat evolution and to enhance survivability, given a penetration, by new compartmentation techniques.
The results of these tests were quite favorable. The flammability assertions by critics were proved to be grossly understated. The aluminum armor does not burn, as has been repeatedly stated.
No, the Bradley is not a perfect weapon system, but it is the best fighting vehicle in the free world. It has met every performance and reliability specification that it was designed for and has become the well-respected backbone of the Mechanized Infantry and Armored Cavalry units that have received it.
Rather, the tests were designed to verify that the Army was getting what it was paying for from the contractor, to check new armors that would help keep pace with threat evolution and to enhance survivability, given a penetration, by new compartmentation techniques.
The results of these tests were quite favorable. The flammability assertions by critics were proved to be grossly understated. The aluminum armor does not burn, as has been repeatedly stated.
No, the Bradley is not a perfect weapon system, but it is the best fighting vehicle in the free world. It has met every performance and reliability specification that it was designed for and has become the well-respected backbone of the Mechanized Infantry and Armored Cavalry units that have received it.
Labels:
Donald R. Keith,
Material Command
Omar Bradley, the General’s General
Shortly before the American invasion force embarked for Normandy on
June 6, 1944, Gen. Omar Bradley, assigned to command 12th Army Group,
convened his corps and division commanders at Bristol for a final
review. There, General Bradley, the “old schoolteacher” from West Point
and the Infantry School, personally conducted the class of generals.
D-Day was full of awful imponderables. Facing the unknown, Bradley fell
back upon the familiar—the world of the classroom and of the Missouri
schoolteacher father he idolized. One by one, he called each general up
to a map of France, proffered a pointer, and asked each to describe in
detail his outfit’s scheme of maneuver. Maxwell Taylor, one of the
generals present that day, could not help but reflect on a similar scene
that had unfolded very differently just a year earlier, when George S.
Patton Jr. met with his commanders before the assault on Sicily. For
Taylor, the contrast between the two men was stark. Patton had “turned
on us with a roar and, waving a menacing swagger stick under our noses,
concluded: ‘I never want to see you bastards again unless it’s at your
post on the shores of Sicily.’” But when Bradley concluded his lesson,
he “folded his hands behind his back, his eyes got a little moist, and
in lieu of a speech, he simply said, ‘Good luck, men.’”
Omar Bradley entered World War II as Patton’s junior, but by the
critical phase of the European campaign had emerged as Patton’s
commanding officer. Nevertheless, throughout the war and in the long
popular memory of that war, he found himself unable to emerge from the
other man’s shadow. Different from Patton in almost every way—personal
background, politics, social class, military philosophy, personality,
skill set, appearance—Bradley was inextricably bound to him, both during
the war and through history’s perspective. Patton’s partisans sometimes
say that it was “conventional” commanders like Bradley who thwarted
their idol’s genius, and even some of Bradley’s admirers would not
entirely disagree with the opinion of 60 Minutes’ professional
curmudgeon, Andy Rooney: “It was because we had so few soldiers like
[Bradley] that we won the war.” Yet the strange truth was that these
antithetical military leaders catalyzed each other through their very
opposition. Bradley didn’t like Patton; Bradley even feared Patton. But
Bradley had the courage and intelligence to use Patton as no other
commander could have or probably would have, and Patton, for his part,
hungered to be so used.
World War II: General Omar Bradley
Early Life & Career of Omar Bradley
Born at Clark, MO on February 12, 1893, Omar Nelson Bradley was the son of schoolteacher John Smith Bradley and his wife Sarah Elizabeth Bradley. Though from a poor family, Bradley received a quality education at Higbee Elementary School and Moberly High School. After graduation, he began working for the Wabash Railroad to earn money to attend the University of Missouri.
During this time, he was advised by his Sunday
school teacher to apply to West Point. Doing so, he was accepted and
entered the academy in 1911. Taking to the academy's disciplined
lifestyle he soon proved gifted at athletics.
This love of sports interfered with his academics, however he still managed to graduate 44th in a class of 164.
A member of the Class of 1915, Bradley was classmates with Dwight D. Eisenhower.
Commissioned as a second lieutenant, he was posted to the 14th Infantry
and saw service along the US-Mexico border. Promoted to first
lieutenant in October 1916, he married Mary Elizabeth Quayle two months
later. With the US entry into World War I in April 1917, the 14th
Infantry, then at Yuma, AZ, was moved to the Pacific Northwest. Now a
captain, Bradley was tasked with policing copper mines in Montana.
Desperate
to be assigned to a combat unit heading to France, Bradley requested a
transfer several times but to no avail. Made a major in August 1918,
Bradley was excited to learn that the 14th Infantry was being deployed
to Europe.
Organizing at Des Moines, IA, as part of the
19th Infantry Division, the regiment remained in the United States as a
result of the armistice and an influenza epidemic. With the US Army's
postwar demobilization, Bradley was detailed to South Dakota State
University to teach military science and reverted to the peacetime rank
of captain.
Interwar Years
In 1920, Bradley was posted to West Point for a four-year tour as a mathematics instructor. Serving under then-Superintendent Douglas MacArthur, Bradley devoted his free time to studying military history, with a special interest in the campaigns of William T. Sherman. Impressed with Sherman's campaigns of movement, Bradley concluded that many of the officers who had fought in France had been misled by the experience of static warfare. As a result, Bradley believed that Sherman's Civil War campaigns were more relevant to future warfare than those of World War I.Promoted to major while at West Point, Bradley was sent to the Infantry School at Fort Benning in 1924. As the curriculum stressed open warfare, he was able to apply his theories and developed a mastery of tactics, terrain, and fire and movement. Utilizing his prior research, he graduated second in his class and in front of many officers who had served in France. After a brief tour with the 27th Infantry, where he befriended George S. Patton, Bradley was selected to attend the Command and General Staff School at Fort Leavenworth, KS in 1928. Graduating the following year, he believed the course to be dated and uninspired.
Departing Leavenworth, Bradley was assigned to the Infantry School as an instructor and served under future-General George C. Marshall. While there, Bradley was impressed by Marshall who favored giving his men an assignment and letting them accomplish it with minimal interference. Deeply influenced by Marshall's methods, Bradley adopted them for his own use in the field. After attending the Army War College, Bradley returned to West Point as an instructor in the Tactical Department. Among his pupils were the future leaders of the US Army such as William C. Westmoreland and Creighton W. Abrams
Omar Bradley in World War II
Promoted to lieutenant colonel in 1936, Bradley was brought to Washington two years later for duty with the War Department. Working for Marshall, who was made Army Chief of Staff in 1939, Bradley was promoted directly to brigadier general in February 1941, and sent to command the Infantry School. While there he promoted the formation of armored and airborne forces as well as developed the prototype Officer Candidate School. With the US entry into War II on December 7, 1941, Marshall asked Bradley to prepare for other duty.orld WGiven command of the reactivated 82nd Division, he oversaw its training before fulfilling a similar role for the 28th Division. In both cases, he utilized Marshall's approach of simplifying military doctrine to make it easier for newly recruited citizen-soldiers. As a result, Bradley's efforts in 1942, produced two fully trained and prepared combat divisions. In February 1943, Bradley was assigned command of X Corps, but before taking the position was ordered to North Africa by Eisenhower to troubleshoot problems with American troops in the wake of the defeat at Kasserine Pass.
Arriving, he recommended that Patton be given command of the US II Corps. This was done and the authoritarian commander soon restored the unit's discipline. Becoming Patton's deputy, Bradley ascended to command of II Corps in April 1943, when Patton departed to aid in planning the invasion of Sicily. For the remainder of the North African Campaign, Bradley ably led the corps and restored its confidence. Serving as part of Patton's Seventh Army, II Corps spearheaded the attack on Sicily in July 1943.
GEN. OMAR N. BRADLEY DEAD AT 88; LAST OF ARMY'S FIVE-STAR GENERALS
General of the Army Omar N. Bradley, a World War II
hero who was the last of the nation's five-star generals, died yesterday
in Manhattan. He was 88 years old.
General Bradley had come to New York to attend a
dinner of the local chapter of the Association of the United States
Army. He was taken to St. Lukes-Roosevelt Hospital in midtown in a
private car at 7:15 P.M., accompanied by his wife, Kitty, and three
military aides, a hospital spokesman said. At 7:35 P.M. he was
pronounced dead by Dr. Stephan Lynn, the director of the hospital's
emergency services, who said the cause of death was cardiac arrest.
General Bradley became the only remaining five-star
general in 1969 after the death of former President Dwight D.
Eisenhower. A Pentagon spokesman said the General had remained
officially on active duty until his death. as do all five-star generals .
He attended President Reagan's inauguration in January in a wheelchair.
'The Honest Mechanic'
Making up in military competence what he lacked in
battlefield glamour, Omar Bradley won four stars in World War II and the
sobriquet of ''the honest mechanic.'' He was also known as the ''G.I.'s
General'' because of his concern for the ordinary soldier.
He commanded, successively, a division, a corps, an
army and finally the 12th United States Army Group in Europe, which
numbered more than 1.3 million combat troops of four armies. In this
capacity he was the senior commander of American ground forces in the
June 1944 invasion of Europe and the subsequent defeat of the Nazi
forces on the Western Front.
It was General Bradley who linked up with Marshal
Ivan Stepanovich Konev of the Soviet Union on the banks of the Elbe
River on April 25, 1945, a dramatic meeting that symbolized the eclipse
of German arms.
Earlier, on April 6, when the Germans' defeat
appeared inevitable, the general had raised the Stars and Stripes over
the frowning fortress of Ehrenbreistein, across the Rhine from Coblenz,
and declared that the Germans could have no doubt about the war's
outcome.
''This time we shall leave the German people with no
illusions about who won the war - and no legends about who lost the
war,'' he said. ''They will know that the brutal Nazi creed they adopted
has led them ingloriously to total defeat.''
In plowing across France from the Normandy landings
of June 1944, and through Germany to the Elbe, General Bradley achieved a
reputation as a brilliant tactician, the foundations of which had been
laid in his campaigns in North Africa and Sicily. The essence of his
tactics was that the best way to fight a modern battle was ''slow and
sure.''
''Don't let this blitzkrieg business fool you,'' he
once said. ''Today we can move our troops into position much faster
than ever before. We can throw a whole division (13,000 soldiers) 150
miles a day, instead of 15 as in the last war. And we can exploit our
victories with even greater speed.
''But the actual fighting of the battle itself is a
different proposition. That's the same old ground battle fought by the
soldier on foot, and it takes almost as much time as it ever did.''
Tall at just over 6 feet, erect, lanky, bespectacled
and bonyfaced, General Bradley was a commander the G.I.'s liked for the
care he took with their lives - and because he looked the part of an
infantryman. In the field he wore an old, stained trench coat, his G.I.
trousers were stuffed into paratroop boots, and his field cap was
unpretentious. His voice, a Missouri drawl, was rarely raised in anger.
He gave the impression of being a plain, homely, stable man, which
indeed he was. Less Flamboyant Than Patton
A.J. Liebling, who covered a number of the general's
campaigns, described him as ''the least dressed-up commander of an
American army in the field since Zachary Taylor, who wore a straw hat.''
And contrasting him with the flamboyant Gen. George S. Patton Jr., the
late Mr. Liebling wrote:
''After the Green Hornet, with his ruddy, truculent
face and his beefy, leather-shathed calves, the new general, lanky and
diffidently amiable, seemed a man of milk.''
At the same time, however, he impressed a war
correspondent as ''a tough, knotty fighter with the tremendous
sledge-hammer persistence of General Grant, the shrewdness of a New
England horse trader and the personal dignity of character and integrity
that can be campared only to the same spacious qualities shown always
by Gen. Robert E. Lee.''
He also possessed enormous self-confidence. General
Bradley recounted the following colloquy that took place when, with Maj.
Gen. William B. Kean Jr., he was drawing up an officer roster for the
Normandy invasion:
'' 'What a helluva responsibility this is for you
and me to be pulling off the biggest invasion of the war.' ''Kean nodded
and stared at the map of Europe on the wall. 'But Bill,' I said
frankly, 'who in the Army knows more about it than we?' '' Lacked Combat
Experience
Remarkably, General Bradley had entered the war
without combat experience. A ''book general'' and the product of an Army
establishment that placed a high premium on honesty and honor, he had
spent his prewar years in routine professorial assignments. And by 1940
he was an obscure lieutenant colonel in civilian clothes who rode a bus
to work in the old Munitions Building in Washington.
But being a ''book general,'' and the habit of
composure that went with it, paid dividends in the war, for he planned
each battle and had confidence in his decisions and in his men. To him
war was a series of mathematical problems, and he went about the
business of reaching his solutions by methods that had been tried and
proved.
Born in the hamlet of Clark, Mo., on Feb. 12, 1893,
Omar Nelson Bradley was the son of an underpaid schoolteacher, who died
when his son was 13. The boy was named Omar for a Missouri newspaper
publisher and Nelson for the family doctor. In Moberly, Mo., where the
youth grew up, he acquired a love for hunting and fishing and was known
for shooting a gun expertly. His high school yearbook described him as
''calculative.''
He went to West Point because his Sunday school
superintendent suggested it as the best choice for a poor boy. His class
at the United States Military Academy, that of 1915, has become known
as the class the stars fell on. It provided more than 30 generals in
World War II, including General Eisenhower and Gen. George E.
Stratemeyer, Air Force commander in the China-India-Burma theater.
Athlete at the Point
Cadet Bradley played football and baseball. As an
outfielder he had a rifle throwing arm. He was graduated 44th in a class
of 164. General Eisenhower, a classmate, graduated 25th in the class.
The serious and shy second lieutenant served a tour
of duty along the Mexican border in 1916 and received a temporary
promotion to major in World War I without seeing service outside the
United States.
After the war, he drew duty as a teacher of military
science and tactics at South Dakota State College, and in 1920 he was
posted to West Point for four years as an instructor in mathematics.
These followed the well-worn groove of a professional soldier in
peacetime: teaching courses and taking them; duty at the Command and
General Staff School and the Army War College. His most glamorous tour
was a hitch in Hawaii.
In 1939, General Bradley was assigned to the General
Staff in Washington. Ten years earlier his work at Fort Benning, Ga.,
had caught the attention of Lieut. Col. George Catlett Marshall, and in
1941 General Marshall plucked Lieut. Col. Bradley out of Washington and
sent him to Fort Benning to convert the tiny Infantry School there into a
huge center capable of handling 14,000 officer candidates at a time.
General Bradley did the job with commendable
dispatch and without raising his voice. Later he trained the 82d and
28th Divisions for combat. In Pursuit of Rommel
In February 1943, the situation in Tunisia was
deteriorating after the Anglo-American landing in Morocco and Algeria in
November 1942. The combined forces had narrowly failed to take Tunis
by a coup de main to catch Gen. Erwin Rommel's Afrika Korps in the rear
as Gen. Bernard Law Montgomery's British army had driven it across
Libya. GET FIRST ADD
The British, Americans and French were bogged down
in mud, cold and discouragement in Tunisia, and there had been much
criticism of the quality of the American command in operation.
General Bradley became deputy commander of the
United States II Corps, fighting in the Tebessa area under General
Patton. His main duty, however, was to act as General Eisenhower's eyes
and ears along the entire front.
The presence of a senior officer out of the chain of
command is always irksome to the responsible commanders, and this
occasion was no exception. But General Eisenhower appraised his men
correctly when he wrote of General Bradley: ''He was a keen judge of men
and their capabilities and was absolutely fair and just in his dealings
with them. Added to this, he was emotionally stable and possessed a
grasp of the larger issues that clearly marked him for high office.''
Generals, junior officers and G.I.'s who were dug in
among the hills of Tunisia soon became familiar with the grave,
low-voiced officer who peered over his glasses in a fatherly fashion as
he made it clear to them that he was not on hand to criticize, but to
gather information to prevent another setback such as the Americans had
suffered at Kasserine Pass.
General Bradley was placed in command of II Corps
after General Patton had received another assignment, and he led it to
the capture of the Nazi-occupied French naval base of Bizerte. He was
promoted to lieutenant general. Proceeded to England
When General Patton's Seventh Army and the British
Eighth Army, commanded by Field Marshal Montgomery, landed in Sicily,
General Bradley still commanded the United States II Corps. Before the
campaign was over General Marshall, the Chief of Staff, notified General
Bradley that he was to proceed to England, where he was to prepare to
command the First United States Army, then muster with British forces
for the Normandy invasion across the English Channel.
When he could spare the time, the General was with
the troops in field inspections, watching them run obstacle courses and
engage in mortar practice. ''I will see you on the beaches,'' he told
the G.I.'s.
Although Field Marshal Montgomery was in direct
command of the assault landings in Normandy on June 6, 1944, the command
of the First Army and ultimately of the 12th Army Group was held by
General Bradley through the remainder of the fighting in France and
Germany. He was ashore fewer than 24 hours after the first Allied units
hit the Normandy beaches.
The First Army, numbering 21 divisions, began its
breakout from the coastal regions late in June behind a tremendous
carpet of air bombardment. On Aug. 1, the Allied ground force command
changed. Field Marshal Montgomery was given command of the British 21st
Army Group, while the 12th Army Group was placed under General Bradley,
who was responsible only to General Eisenhower.
In the Normandy beachhead, Field Marshall
Montgomery's British and Canadian force had the primary mission of
holding the anchor of the line in the Caen area. Meanwhile, plans were
made for the American forces to execute an end run around the German
defensive positions. Patton Broke Through
General Patton's Third Army managed a breakthrough
at Avranches and fanned southward and finally eastward and northward to
close in on the rear of the German Seventh Army at Falaise. Although
supporters of Field Marshal Montgomery have pointed out that he was
facing more formidable opposition than the 12th Army Group, General
Bradley felt that the British should have made a greater attempt to
close the narrow Falaise gap through which the greater part of the
German Seventh Army managed to squeeze to temporary safety. As it was,
more than 70,000 Germans were caught in the trap.
While the British and Canadian armies were pushing
northward along the English Channel, Paris was recaptured by the Second
French Armored Division and other elements of the First French Army,
aided by General Patton's V Corps and the French Forces of the Interior.
As the Germans retreated toward the Rhine, hopes ran high for a quick
end to the war in Europe.
September 1944 was, as General Bradley put it, ''the
month of the Big Bust.'' Paris had fallen, and by Sept. 14 the front
line extended from a region north of the English Channel port of Dunkirk
through Antwerp and Aachen and Metz down to the Swiss and Italian
borders.
On Sept. 3, American tanks broke across the German
border near Aachen, and General Bradley pulled up stakes at Dreux, a few
miles east of Paris, and established his army group command post at
Verdun.
But the fast-moving Americans had outrun their
supply lines and lost their momentum. For the next two months, General
Bradley and the impatient General Patton were to wait at the German
border for gasoline and ammunition. The dash for the Rhine had fallen
just short of success. Bradley vs. Montgomery
There ensued a lengthy period of tug-of-war between
General Bradley and Field Marshal Montgomery in the matter of priority
for supplies. German resistance had stiffened on the British front as
well as in front of General Bradley's men, and General Eisenhower was
called upon to make a decision between the British proposals for
operations and those proposed by General Bradley. Field Marshal
Montgomery wanted to ram a spearhead through to the industrial Ruhr
Valley. General Bradley favored a broad advance along the line into
Germany.
The Germans, however, were massing for a desperate
attempt to break through the Ardennes to capture the port of Antwerp.
Field Marshal Gerd von Rundstedt had accumulated 600 tanks for this last
garrison finish.
''In the face of this astonishing build up, I had
greatly underestimated the enemy's offensive capabilities,'' General
Bradley recalled in his memoirs. ''My embarrassment was not unique, for
it was shared not only by the army commanders but by Montgomery and
Eisenhower as well.''
When the German blow fell on Dec. 16, the 12th Army
Group was caught without a division in reserve. Remnants of four German
armies participated in the Battle of the Bulge, but while many units
were overrun, Bastogne held and the Germans were too weak to exploit
their initial success. General Eisenhower found it advisable to assign
to the command of Field Marshal Montgomery such United States troops as
were pushed north of the bulge. The troops were returned to General
Bradley's command when the emergency was over.
The check administered to the 12th Army Group in the
Battle of the Bulge led to pressure from the British to return Field
Marshall Montgomery to his former position as commander of the ground
forces. General Bradley told General Eisenhower flatly that he would
not serve under Field Marshall Montgomery and that ''you must send me
home, for if Montgomery goes in over me, I will have lost the confidence
of my command.'' It was Winston Churchill who poured oil on the
troubled waters. Crossed at Remagen
General Bradley's men crossed the Rhine at Remagen
on March 7, were across in strength by March 22 and sped on toward the
heart of Germany. A total of 325,000 German prisoners were captured in
an encircling movement south of Essen and Dortmund. United States troops
joined with the Soviet forces at Torgau on April 25, and General
Bradley paid a courtesy visit to the Russian commander, Marshal Konev,
who entertained the American commander with a troupe of female ballet
dancers whom he identified as members of the Red Army. Later General
Bradley invited Marshal Konev to his headquarters, where Jascha Heifetz
entertained them with violin solos.
After Germany's capitulation, General Bradley
returned to Washington and took over as head of the Veterans
Administration from 1945 to 1947. He then became Chief of Staff of the
Army and served two terms as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff,
departing in 1954. He was made a five-star general in 1950.
Besides General Eisenhower, three other men in the
history of the United States have attained the title of General of the
Army: Henry H. Arnold, Douglas MacArthur and George C. Marshall. John J.
Pershing was awarded five stars and the title ''General of the Armies''
by an act of Congress in 1919. The only other man to have held that
rank was George Washington.
After stepping down - General Bradely did not retire
because Generals of the Army are considered as always available for
recall to active duty - he joined the Bulova Research and Development
Laboratories. He was later named board chairman of its parent company,
the Bulova Watch Company. He was also on the board of the Food Fair
Stores and of Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc.
General Bradley celebrated his last birthday on Feb.
12 at Fort Bliss in El Paso, where he and his wife had been living
since 1977. The general was recovering from a viral infection in
February and had earlier been confined to a wheelchair because of knee
problems going back to his days on the West Point football team.
He married Mary Elizabeth Quayle in 1916, a year
after his graduation from West Point. They had a daughter, Elizabeth.
Mrs. Bradley died in 1965, and the next year he married Esther Buhler,
known as Kitty, who survives.
Illustrations: Photo of Gen Bradley, Dwight
Eisenhower and Field Marshal Montgomery Photo of Gen. Bradley
Omar Nelson Bradley United States general
Bradley graduated from the United States Military Academy at West Point, New York, in 1915. At the opening of World War II, he was commandant of the U.S. Army Infantry School, Fort Benning, Georgia, and he later commanded the 82nd and 28th infantry divisions. After being placed at the head of the II Corps for the North African campaign, under General George S. Patton, he captured Bizerte, Tunisia, in May 1943. This victory contributed directly to the fall of Tunisia and the surrender of more than 250,000 Axis troops. Bradley then led his forces in the Sicilian invasion, which was successfully concluded in August.
Later in 1943 Bradley was transferred to Great Britain, where he was given command of the U.S. First Army in 1944. Placed under the command of British Field Marshal Bernard Montgomery, he took part in planning the invasion of France. In June 1944 he joined his troops in the assault on the Normandy beaches and in the initial battles inland (see Normandy Invasion). At the beginning of August, he was elevated to command of the U.S. Twelfth Army Group. Under his leadership the First, Third, Ninth, and Fifteenth armies, the largest force ever placed under an American group commander, successfully carried on operations in France, Luxembourg, Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany, and Czechoslovakia until the end of European hostilities.
After retiring from the army in 1953, Bradley was active in private enterprise. In 1951 he published his reminiscences, A Soldier’s Story. A General’s Life (with Clay Blair) was published in 1983.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)


